If people are willing to work for $5 an hour rather than not work and make $0 an hour, we should let them. Most good jobs pay over minimum anyway, even though the government doesn’t require them to.
Repealing Obamacare would end the mandate that small companies provide employers with health insurance, so they can afford to hire more.
So $0 an hour is less poverty than $5 an hour?
So, if the republicans that plan to freeload on the system by exercising their right to not buy health insurance happen to get seriously ill and seek very costly care that they cannot pay for, why should I (we) not have the right to sue them in a class action law suit to recover the money.
To the guy that goes by the name “lie some more” If everybody that can afford health insurance, DOES buy health insurance and if everybody can’t afford it gets free care anyway, then why is the mandate dumb?
INCLUDING the mandate, and he will still voted in a president. Does that not stand to reason that the voters who put him into office knew what they were getting?
*Note I’m not advocating Obamacare one way or the other, but these people saying X% of America doesn’t want it, doesn’t the fact that they voted him in knowing his intent show otherwise?
BTW, I am not offended to being called gay, so slurs such as that fly right over my head–just like how clues fly right over that bald guy’s head. i work for an organization that spent about $2.8M into the Philippines in 2006 and a little bit more by the end of this year, by way of programs and projects in education and healthcare